Smartphones leave disastrous environmental footprint
Smartphone production and disposal over the past 10 years had a significant impact on the planet.
This is according to a report published by environmental activist group Greenpeace. The report shows roughly 968TWh of power was used to manufacture smartphones since 2007 – nearly the equivalent of one year's power supply for India – and the devices contribute significantly to the 50 million metric tonnes of e-waste expected to be generated in 2017.
The organisation says the supply chain for smartphones is long and complex. Generally speaking, phones are predominantly made up of a combination of metals, including rare earth elements, glass and plastic, it explains.
Aluminium, cobalt and gold are a few of the more than 60 elements used to make advanced electronics such as smartphones, and they are obtained from mining operations around the world, or in some cases, from recycled materials.
Plastic is derived from crude oil, and while some larger electronic devices contain some post-consumer recycled plastic, this is still an emerging practice in smartphones. Integrated circuits, such as memory chips, CPUs and graphic chips are critical components of smartphones. These are made up of silicon wafers, the making of which requires a great deal of energy and water, says Greenpeace.
Greenpeace's report, "From Smart to Senseless: The Global Impact of Ten Years of Smartphones", provides an overview on the increasing use of smartphones across the world since the release of the first iPhone in 2007, and how this has impacted our planet.
Some of the key findings in the report include that 7.1 billion smartphones have been produced since 2007.
Greenpeace says in 2014 alone, e-waste from small IT products like smartphones was estimated to be three million metric tonnes, according to a United Nations University study. Less than 16% of global e-waste is believed to be recycled, it adds.
Only two of 13 models Greenpeace reviewed as part of the research had easily replaceable batteries. This means consumers are forced to replace the whole device when the battery life starts to dwindle, says Greenpeace. In the US, it adds, smartphones are used for an average of 26 months.
Smartphone ownership is expected to rise to 6.1 billion phones in 2020, or roughly 70% of the global population, the environmental activist group says.
"If all the smartphones produced in the last decade were still functional, there would be roughly enough for every person on the planet. Consumers are pushed to upgrade their models so frequently that the average device is used for just over two years. The impacts on the planet are devastating," says Elizabeth Jardim, senior corporate campaigner at Greenpeace USA.
"When you consider all of the materials and energy required to make these devices, their short lifespans, and the low rate of recycling, it's clear we can't continue this way. We need devices that last longer and ultimately, we need companies to embrace a new, circular production model."
Greenpeace is calling on the whole IT sector to embrace a circular production model in order to address the root cause of many of these environmental challenges.
The activists demand Samsung reuse and recycle the 4.3 million Galaxy Note 7s recalled in 2016 following reports the devices were exploding or catching fire.
"What has happened with Samsung's recall of the Galaxy Note 7 is indicative of a wasteful and unsustainable system. Rushed design and production cycles can lead to wasteful mistakes, not to mention the impact on our planet," says Jude Lee, global senior campaigner at Greenpeace East Asia.
"Samsung still hasn't shared a clear plan to deal with the 4.3 million phones that it recalled. If Samsung is serious about making sure this never happens again, it must lead the IT sector and move towards a system that allows phones to be more easily repaired, reused and recycled."
Greenpeace says Samsung should lead by example and publicly commit to recycle the Galaxy Note 7s while minimising their impact on people and the environment. It must also be transparent about how it intends to deal with these phones.